Ebook {Epub PDF} Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion by Paul Bloom

Against Empathy is, imo, not so much an argument against empathy as it is a meticulous separation of the specific concept of empathy from the other values it is often conflated with, such as kindness, compassion, generosity, etc. Bloom believes that empathy can be a poor moral guide. This is most apparent in cases where too much empathy might hinder a person's judgement/5(K).  · The author of a new book titled Against Empathy, Bloom uses clinical studies and simple logic to argue that empathy, however well-intentioned, is Author: Sean Illing.  · Bloom argues with evidence, conviction and logic that empathy is bad for you – and us. Empathy, he argues is biased, myopic, and innumerate – often leading to bad decisions, prejudice and dysfunctional behaviour. In six chapters and two ‘interludes’ Against Empathy seeks to cull the sacred cow of empathy with five key evidence-based arguments. But first, Bloom clarifies what empathy is .

In AGAINST EMPATHY, Bloom reveals empathy to be one of the leading motivators of inequality and immorality in society. Far from helping us to improve the lives of others, empathy is a capricious and irrational emotion that appeals to our narrow prejudices. It muddles our judgment and, ironically, often leads to cruelty. Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion Author: Paul Bloom Publisher: Ecco Publication: Are you a good "mindreader"? Empathy techniques for reading the minds of consumers are becoming increasingly popular in insight, innovation, and design. Despite supernatural overtones, mindreading is perfectly natural and one of two defining characteristics of the human capacity for. Paul Bloom's new book, "Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion," is too highbrow to be a self-help or parenting manual, but parts of it could bltadwin.ru wingspan is too wide to be a.

Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion is a book written by psychologist Paul Bloom. The book draws on the distinctions between empathy, compassion, and moral decision making. Bloom argues that empathy is not the solution to problems that divide people and is a poor guide for decision making. However, he is not completely against empathy; he believes that empathy can motivate kindness to make the world a better place. Overall, the book received mixed reviews as some reviewers cri. Paul Bloom builds a case for rational compassion, where we use our heads as well as our hearts. He questions empathy’s use in politics, in empathising with one group against another. He views empathy as something that can be manipulated by politicians to get us to feel the plight of certain groups, while cutting off from feeling the plight of others. Bloom argues with evidence, conviction and logic that empathy is bad for you – and us. Empathy, he argues is biased, myopic, and innumerate – often leading to bad decisions, prejudice and dysfunctional behaviour. In six chapters and two ‘interludes’ Against Empathy seeks to cull the sacred cow of empathy with five key evidence-based arguments. But first, Bloom clarifies what empathy is and isn’t. When you feel concern or compassion for someone (e.g. your consumer), that’s not.